Petition 002-Treaties Not Under the Authority of the United States Government

Download as a Word .doc

FIRST AMENDMENT PETITION FOR REDRESS OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN DOMESTIC ENGINEERING
Reference (A): RTR MO Petition 002
Reference (A) Long Title: First Amendment Petition for Redress of Violations of the Constitution for the United States of America by All Three Branches of the General Government
Reference (A) Short Title: Violations of the Constitution through Treaties Not Under the Authority of the United States Government
Reference (B): RTR VA Petition 006
Reference (B Long Title: First Amendment Petition for Redress of Violations of the Constitution for the United States of America by the Federal Government in Operating the Department of Transportation
Reference (B) Short Title: The Department of Transportation – A Violation of the Constitution
Reference (C): RTR VA Petition 008
Reference (C) Long Title: First Amendment Petition for Redress of Violations of Legislative Authority and the Separation of Powers within the Constitution for the United States
Reference (C) Short Title: Petition for Redress of Violations of Legislative Authority
Reference (D): RTR IA Petition 012
Reference (D) Long Title: First Amendment Petition for Redress of Violations of the Constitution for the United States of America by the Federal Government in Operating the Department of Commerce
Reference (D) Short Title: The Department of Commerce – A Violation of the Constitution
Reference (D): RTR IA Petition 012
Reference (E) Long Title: First Amendment Petition for Redress of Violations of the Constitution for the United States of America by the Federal Government in Operating the Department of Interior
Reference (E) Short Title: The Department of Interior – A Violation of the Constitution
Reference (E): RTR IA Petition 013
Reference (F) Long Title: First Amendment Petition for Redress of Violations of The Constitution for the United States of America by the Federal Government in Operating the Department of Energy
Reference (F) Short Title: The Department of Energy – A Violation of the Constitution
Reference (F): RTR IA Petition 014
Reference (G) Long Title: First Amendment Petition for Redress of Violations of the Constitution for the United States of America by the Federal Government in Operating the Environmental Protection Agency
Reference (G) Short Title: The Environmental Protection Agency – A Violation of the Constitution
Reference (G): RTR IA Petition 015
Reference (A) above, was submitted to the county name County commissioners/supervisors, of the State of state name, on the DD MMM YY, which establishes and provides irrefutable facts for the submission of this First Amendment Petition for the Redress of Grievances as follows:

Clarifies that the only form of treaties within the jurisdiction of the general government is regarding commerce with other nations and treaties regarding war. The general government does not have the authority to subjugate the States to foreign polities or foreign laws.
The role of emissaries and relations is solely delegated to the Executive Branch and the in accordance to the Supremacy Clause the only form of treaties that the United States can enter into are limited to the enumerated RRPPs; thus, “treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States” shall be legitimate. Any treaty made outside of the granted RRPPs are illegitimate, regardless of whether they are currently in force or not. We the people, the States, and our general government are not and cannot be bound to treaties made without Constitutional authority granted by the States.
Reference (B) above, was submitted to the county name County commissioners/supervisors, of the State of state name, on the DD MMM YY, which establishes and provides irrefutable facts for the submission of this First Amendment Petition for the Redress of Grievances as follows:
The jurisdictional and Constitutional limitations of the general government are limited to those specified roles, responsibilities, powers, and properties (RRPPs) enumerated and or defined within the body of the original text within the Constitution for the United States that was ratified by the original thirteen states and or its amendments. If an RRPP is not enumerated, the general government does not have the Constitutional authority to exercise or possess the RRPP.
The only way a new RRPP can be constitutionally granted to the general government, is through the Article V amendment process.
A brief history with the undeniable evidence as to how the general government usurped RRPPs not delegated by using acts and legislation, to serve a political agenda of centralizing RRPPs underneath the control of the general government.
Clarification of the terms defining Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, during the debates in Congress stipulating the requirement of all public servants while under oath are required to exert the necessary force to interpose and arrest the evil appertaining the violations and or insurgencies against the Constitution since the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. Therefore, all public servants under the Constitutional oath or affirmation of office to support the Constitution and fail to actively support the Constitution are no longer eligible to be a public service and are to be immediately removed and banned from hold an public office trust or profit ever again.
Reference B also provides the history and legal requirement for all governments formed under the Constitution for the United States, local, state, or federal as instituted by the people and or their direct representatives (i.e. sovereigns) with specified RRPPs in a Republican form of government and that these Representatives of the people are legally obligated to unite as the parties to the compact (i.e. the Counties representatives are the parties to State Constitutions and the State representatives are the parties to the federal Constitution), to judge how to deal with violations of the aforementioned Constitution(s) and must interpose with the “necessary measures” and force to obtain full compliance to their compact(s).
Reference (C) above was submitted to the county name County commissioners/supervisors, of the State of state name, on the DD MMM YY, which establishes and provides irrefutable facts for the submission of this First Amendment Petition for the Redress of Grievances as follows:
Neither the executive or the judicial branches have the Constitutional authority to create law nor do they have the authority to:
a. Redefine the Constitution for the United States if it was already defined in the Ratification debates or by Congress.
b. Use case law or precedence in the hearing of a case – the States would have rejected ratifying the Constitution had this been proposed. More importantly, the Constitution was constantly justified that the States where the final judges as to what is and what is not constitutional; thus, the process to amend or change these terms and definitions is through the mode specified in Article V of the Constitution for the United States.
c. The Judiciary does not have the authority within the Constitution for the United States to interpret what they believe anything means within the text of the Constitution for the United States – if there is something that has not been defined, the Judiciary must go to Congress to either provide the clarity based upon the Ratification Debates or initial Congressional terms and definitions and the if the matter is not defined Congress must submit an amendment to the Constitution for the United States to the States per Article V of the Constitution.
Reference (D) above was submitted to the county name County commissioners/supervisors, of the State of state name, on the DD MMM YY, which establishes and provides irrefutable facts for the submission of this First Amendment Petition for the Redress of Grievances as follows:
within a State or general interstate commerce; unless there is a dispute between two or more States in the Union. When a dispute arises the Judiciary is to ensure State sovereignty is protected; therefore, the rulings from the judiciary must be to that end – that the States retain their sovereignty over the commerce within their State.
Many unconstitutional usurpation’s of RRPPs were the result of federal court rulings where the court unconstitutionally aggrandized federal involvement in interstate commerce as well as granting the federal government the ability to regulate commerce within the States; in turn, many of the unconstitutional usurpations asserted by the federal government in assuming new RRPPs that were used for the establishment the Department of Commerce were also used for the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Reference (E) above was submitted to the county name County commissioners/supervisors, of the State of state name, on the DD MMM YY, which establishes and provides irrefutable facts for the submission of this First Amendment Petition for the Redress of Grievances as follows:
The federal government cannot possess any land, property, or resource within a State except for the land enumerated within Article I Section 8 for the purposes of erecting “Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings” only.
The only mention of “territory” within the Constitution for the United States is found in Article IV, Section 3 and the Eighteenth Amendment (which was repealed by the Twenty-first Amendment). The purpose of mentioning territory in Article IV, Section 3 in not an enumeration of a power to the federal government but an enumeration of a responsibility. Therefore, the purpose of possessing any territory is for the admission of States into the Union Not a grant for the federal government to permanently hold territory; thus, the possession of territories and the ability to “make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States” is an incidental role in direct relation to their responsibility to admit new States into the Union only.
Many of the unconstitutional usurpations asserted by the federal government in assuming new RRPPs that were used for the establishment of the Department of Interior was also used to contribute to the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Reference (F) above was submitted to the county name County commissioners/supervisors, of the State of state name, on the DD MMM YY which establishes and provides irrefutable facts for the submission of this First Amendment Petition for the Redress of Grievances as follows:
That the states have not delegated to the federal government any RRPP over the matters of Energy.
Many of the unconstitutional usurpations asserted by the federal government in assuming new RRPPs that were used for the establishment of the Department of Energy were used for the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Reference (G) above was submitted to the county name County commissioners/supervisors, of the State of state name, on the DD MMM YY which establishes and provides irrefutable facts for the submission of this First Amendment Petition for the Redress of Grievances as follows:
That the states have not delegated to the federal government any RRPP over the matters of Energy.
Many of the unconstitutional usurpations asserted by the federal government in assuming new RRPPs that were used for the establishment of the Department of Energy were used for the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency.
THEREFORE, in pursuance to Article I, Article II, Article III, Article IV, Article V, Article VI, and the First, Tenth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution for the United States of America, the undersigned, as citizens of the United States, We the People of the United States and the residents of the County of Bremer within the State of Iowa, hereby exercise our constitutionally protected “right” to petition our direct representative government (i.e. County Commissioners) for the redress of grievances regarding violations of the Constitution for the United States of America in regard to the usurpation of any and all matters within the State regarding any form of engineering by the federal government which there is no RRPP enumerated to do so within the Constitution for the United States, and
WHEREAS, a common and accepted definition of engineering as:
“The creative application of scientific principles to design or develop structures, machines, apparatus, or manufacturing processes, or works utilizing them singly or in combination; or to construct or operate the same with full cognizance of their design; or to forecast their behavior under specific operating conditions; all as respects an intended function, economics of operation and safety to life and property.”
In essence to design and implement a solution to a perceived problem, and
WHEREAS, in concert with Reference A, B, C, D, E, F, and G, that the States as the only Parties to the Constitution have not delegated any authority to the federal government any general powers nor have the States delegated an RRPP to engineer a solution to any matter not delegated within the Constitution for the United States, and
WHEREAS, engineering can be summarized as the application of scientific and mathematical principles to practical ends such as the design, manufacture, and operation of efficient and economical structures, machines, processes, and systems. In countering Anti-Federalist assertions for the need of a Bill of Rights, the Constitution was constantly justified in the Ratification Debates as a limited and specified power of attorney. In the Virginia Rstification Debates George Nicolas stated:
“In England, in all disputes between the king and people, recurrence is had to the enumerated rights of the people, to determine. Are the rights in dispute secured? Are they included in Magna Charta, Bill of Rights, &c.? If not, they are, generally speaking, within the king’s prerogative, In disputes between Congress and the people, the reverse of the proposition holds. Is the disputed right enumerated? If not, Congress cannot meddle with it.”
Nicolas later also stated:
“Therefore, from theory and practice, it may be concluded that this government, with special powers, without any express exceptions, is better than a government with general powers and special exceptions. But the practice of England is against us. The rights there reserved to the people are to limit and check the king’s prerogative. It is easier to enumerate the exceptions to his prerogative, than to mention all the cases to which it extends. Besides, these reservations, being only formed in acts of the legislature, may be altered by the representatives of the people when they think proper. No comparison can be made of this with the other governments he mentioned. There is no stipulation between the king and people. The former is possessed of absolute, unlimited authority.”
Governor Randolph asserted:
“There is not a word said, in the state government, of the powers given to it, because they are general. But in the general Constitution, its powers are enumerated. Is it not, then, fairly deducible, that it has no power but what is expressly given it? — for if its powers were to be general, an enumeration would be needless.
But the insertion of the negative restrictions has given cause of triumph, it seems, to gentlemen. They suppose that it demonstrates that Congress are to have powers by implication. I will meet them on that ground. I persuade myself that every exception here mentioned is an exception, not from general powers, but from the particular powers therein vested.”
In a summary description in Federalist Paper #45, James Madison stated:
“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.”
To be clear, the federal government was created to protect and secure the sovereignty of the States and the nation. There are no enumerations in the Constitution for the Unites States granting to the federal government the authority meddle with any of the following sectors of domestic affairs in the Union, let all the allowance for any form of engineering in:
Economics: The regulating every stage and factor involved in production to create positive or negative outcomes to a single market within the economy or affect the entire economy. Stages can include mining, farming, manufacturing, and construction to name a few.
Social-Engineering: Social engineering is the art of exploiting human psychology, rather than technical hacking techniques, to gain access to buildings, systems, or data. “Social engineering uses influence and persuasion to deceive people by convincing them that the social engineer is someone he is not, or by manipulation. As a result, the social engineer is able to take advantage of people to obtain information with or without the use of technology.”
Health-Engineering: In its succinct definition, Healthcare Engineering is “engineering involved in all aspects of healthcare.” The term “engineering” in this definition covers all engineering disciplines such as biomedical, chemical, civil, computer, electrical, environmental, hospital architecture, industrial, information, materials, mechanical, software, and systems engineering.
Geoengineering: “Traditionally, geoengineering has encompassed two very different things: sucking carbon dioxide out of the sky so the atmosphere will trap less heat, and reflecting more sunlight away from the planet so less heat is absorbed in the first place.
Financial Engineering: is a multidisciplinary field involving financial theory, methods of engineering, tools of mathematics and the practice of programming. It has also been defined as the application of technical methods, especially from mathematical finance and computational finance, in the practice of finance.
Cultural Engineering: Cultural Engineering is the study, analysis and strategic implementation of cultural ecosystems in their social, political, environmental, technical, economic and financial aspects. It is a complex combination of intangibles (content, values, know-how, rights …) in a variety of contexts and organizations, and involves managing interactions between its components.
Biological Engineering: Biological engineering or bioengineering is the application of principles of biology and the tools of engineering to create usable, tangible, economically viable products. Biological engineering employs knowledge and expertise from a number of pure and applied sciences, such as mass and heat transfer, kinetics, biocatalysts, biomechanics, bioinformatics, separation and purification processes, bioreactor design, surface science, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and polymer science. It is used in the design of medical devices, diagnostic equipment, biocompatible materials, renewable energy, ecological engineering, agricultural engineering, process engineering and catalysis, and other areas that improve the living standards of societies.
a. Genetic Engineering: Is a sub-discipline of Biological Engineering. Genetic engineering, also called genetic modification or genetic manipulation, is the modification and manipulation of an organism’s genes using technology. It is a set of technologies used to change the genetic makeup of cells, including the transfer of genes within and across species boundaries to produce improved or novel organisms. New DNA is obtained by either isolating and copying the genetic material of interest using recombinant DNA methods or by artificially synthesizing the DNA.
Consequently, due to the point in fact that each of the aforementioned topics let alone the efforts of engineering are not enumerated in the Constitution; thus, all forms of federal governments involvement in engineering is unconstitutional in equivalence with References B, D, E, F, and F, and
WHEREAS, in congruence with Reference A, the federal government cannot obtain authority though the unconstitutional ratification of a treaty, all treaties made must “be made, under the Authority of the United States.” As George Nicolas stated that:
“the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all the treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land. They can, by this, make no treaty which shall be repugnant to the spirit of the Constitution, or inconsistent with the delegated powers. The treaties they make must be under the authority of the United States, to be within their province. It is sufficiently secured, because it only declares that, in pursuance of the powers given, they shall be the supreme law of the land, notwithstanding any thing in the constitution or laws of particular states.”
Therefore, the only way the federal government can obtain a RRPP to apply any form of engineering domestically or internationally is through an amendment to the Constitution for the United States in the mode described in Article V of the Constitution, and
WHEREAS, in agreement with the Ratification Debates that the federal government was strictly limited to the RRPPs granted on the Constitution and in accordance to the Tenth Amendment that clearly articulates:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,”
and
WHEREAS, in pursuance to the Constitution for the United States and specifically Article V, that the only proper response from any public servant serving in any branch of the general or state government regarding the sundry of breaches to the Constitution under the felonious assertion that the federal government can assume any power necessary due to 1) Commerce Clause, 2) the defense and welfare Clause, 3) the necessary and Proper Clause, or 4) the Supremacy Clause – reference B clearly cites that Presidents Madison, Monroe, and Jackson all pointed out that these clauses were not portals for the federal government to assume new RRPPs; when it fact all public servants should, regardless of station, have acted as Presidents Madison, Monroe, and Jackson in admonishing any and all who have and are serving in the executive, legislative, and or the judicial branches, for attempting to assume a RRPP not delegated, and
WHEREAS, even though the Executive, the Judiciary, as well as the Legislative branches for over two centuries have found that violating of the Constitution as justifiable, each violation will always remain as a violation due to the point in fact that there is not allowance in the Constitution for a violation of the Constitution to become a legitimate part of the Constitution after some period of time without an Amendment; thus, the necessity of decommissioning any and all engineering efforts by the federal government, and
WHEREAS, as Thomas Jefferson stated:
“Ignorance of the law is no excuse in any country. If it were, the laws would lose their effect, because it can always be pretended” and today our law and government are being pretended.”
Consequently, no one is above the law:
“For centuries Magna Carta has stood for the principle that no man is above the law, not even a king. Although King John’s Magna Carta does not explicitly articulate this idea, it did create checks designed to restrain the king whenever he failed to uphold the terms of the charter. Chapter 61 of King John’s Magna Carta stipulates that twenty-five barons should be selected to ensure that the king upholds all of the provisions of the charter. When the king is in violation, the barons have the authority to seize the king’s properties by military force—or “distrain” him—until he complies.”
Consequently, all public servants whether they are ignorant or not, have no excuse continuing to pretend RRPPs as well as performing administration functions such as taking unconstitutional oaths of office – they must in accordance with the Supreme Law of the land support, defend, and obey the Constitution for the United States, and
WHEREAS, Reference A and B, clearly connects the Constitutional requirement for all public servants to take the specific oath or affirmation to actively “support” the Constitution for the United States within Article VI. This includes the people’s First Amendment right of petition to hold our government accountable to that oath or affirmation. Reference A also connects both the oath affirmation in Article VI and the First Amendment right of Petitioning government for the redress of grievances to Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. As such, any public servant regardless of position – having been petitioned to support the Constitution, who is serving under an oath or affirmation to actively “support” the Constitution for the United States (other than the President and Vice President) while under the oath or affirmation and fails to support the Constitution is no longer eligible to serve anymore as a public servant for the remainder of their life unless two-thirds of both houses of Congress remove this ineligibility or “disability” from the removed public servant, and
WHREEAS, in accordance with Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution for the United States, “The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union, a republican form of government,” and in America, a government “Republican in Form” is a Government based on the written will and consent of the People, instituted to secure the individual’s natural Rights and where the Law is King; and
WHEREAS, with every Right there is a remedy and any Right that is not enforceable is not a Right; and
NOW THEREFORE, in conformity to the three Presidential Vetoes cited in Reference B, regarding Congress assuming RRPP’s that would be the footings for a Department of Transportation; that the Environmental Protection Agency and its RRPPs are a direct and palpable violation to the Constitution and must be disbanded and dissolved, as Reference A also points out that only the States are the Parties to Constitution and that any form of engineering by the federal government or sanctioned by the federal government is a palpable violation to the Constitution for the United States, and
NOW THEREFORE, in accordance with Reference entire list of references and James Madison’s assertion that the federal government RRPPS are directly tied to the objects that are enumerated in the Constitution. In concert with James Madison’s assertion that the Constitution for the United States falls within the fundamental tenants of contract law that compacts can be audited by the Parties to the Compact and in accordance with Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution for the United States, that the States are guaranteed a Republican form of government and that a Republican form of government is based upon the rule of law. No government can make a law “abridging the… right of the people… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Consequently, our elected County Commissioners, who serve “We the People” us as our direct representatives in addition to our State Legislators, who in accordance with Article VI Section 3 of the Constitution for the United States must also take an oath of office prior to their service to support the Constitution for the United States as well as the State of Iowa. As We the People of Bremer County exert our inalienable and constitutionally protected civil right of petitioning our government for the redress of grievances as found in the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States. We therefore demand the Board of Commissioners of Bremer County do the following to fulfill their oath of office “to support” the Constitution for the United States to begin by demanding the disbanding and dissolution of any and all forms of engineering by (or sanctioned by the federal government), by our local and state representatives complying and adhering to the following expectations:
First:
As a united body of Commissioners of Bremer County, you must call for and organize a standing Federal Review Committee from the community (voluntary or reimbursed for expenses), to initiate specific directed efforts to 1) definitize which Constitution the County of Bremer will recognize and 2) audit the Constitution for the United States to identify all violations of the Constitution.
• Definitize: The definitive Constitution can only be the original Constitution and all of its ratified amendments; therefore, the committee must declare that only original Constitution and its ratified amendments are authorized by the county and the committee must also include the legally provided terms and definitions to the Constitution in accordance with the founding documents of the Constitution (i.e. only the Ratification Debates of the federal Constitution) as to what each clause meant as the Federalists provided to the body of delegates for each State as to what these words and clauses meant. Consequently rejecting any and all attempts to redefine the Constitution for the United States and declaring that the Federalist elucidations in the Ratification Debates are the only legal terms and legally stipulated what each word and clause meant. Thus, assisting the delegates to make the ultimate decision to ratify or reject the federal Constitution.
• Audit: Equally critical to the process of definitizing the Constitution, the committee must also extrapolate and deduce what RRPP’s are granted within the original Constitution for the United States and ratified amendments in accordance to the terms and definitions specified in the Ratification Debates and identify all RRPP’s currently exercised or possessed by the Federal Government that are not delegated within the enumerated RRPP’s of the Constitution for the United States and identify them for disposition by the States during the “Republic Review process.” Furthermore, it is incumbent upon those who stand in public service who govern We the People, must have access and be profoundly familiar with the Definitive Constitution and its terms and definitions to help educate the Citizens, that within a Republican Form of Government, to know the law and processes without question what is Constitutional and what is NOT and why.
The “Federal Review Committee roles and responsibilities” as well as the “Federal Review Committee Flowchart” is available as well as direct guidance can be obtained from Reclaiming the Republic from their “Contact us” page.
Second:
Concurrently, while forming a standing committee, the Commissioners of Bremer County must promulgate this Petition with an endorsement cover letter, calling upon all county’s within the State of Iowa, to join Bremer County in coordinating a simultaneous effort with Bremer County and all other counties 1) the audit that all counties must acquiesce upon the definitized Constitution as legally and academically stipulated during the federal Ratification Debates to precisely clarify all unconstitutional RRPP’s – as their oath of office demands, 2) fully report concurrence or refusal to this Constitutional requirement with clear documentation of each public servants as to their position regarding their requirement to support the Constitution and taking immediate action to obtain full clarity as to what is Constitutional and what is not through the audit and definitizing efforts or refusal to support these efforts.
Third:
The Commissioners of Bremer County promulgate this Petition with an endorsement cover letter to the State Legislature of Iowa, for them to form a permanent Constitutional Compliance Committee to acquiesce upon the legally necessity to begin coordinating with Bremer County all items of the audit as they are approved are to be shared with sister counties who will then, as the representatives of the people of the counties of the State of Iowa petition the Legislature for the State of Iowa for and on the behalf of the citizens of Bremer County.
Fourth:
The Iowa State Legislature will pass the following legislation to fulfill their oath of office in 1) “supporting the Constitution” and 2) demanding all public servants and governments and none government entities be in full compliance to the Constitution; thus:
• BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IOWA:
• There is hereby created a joint federal review committee to:
o Review all federal action to determine if the sovereignty of the state of Iowa and the powers, rights, and liberties of its citizens, as legally defined during the ratification debates of the several states in ratifying the United States Constitution, are being infringed upon or diminished;
o Determine and make findings as to which federal actions are not consistent with the roles, responsibilities, and powers of the federal government enumerated in the United States Constitution. This duty shall be exercised without regard for any decision by a federal court or by the Supreme Court of the United States that attempts to interpret federal action; and
o Sponsor legislation, report to the Legislature, and advise the legislature consistent with any determinations and findings concerning the constitutionality of federal actions.
• For the purposes of this section, the term, federal action, means all new and existing federal laws, resolutions, rules, regulations, decrees, orders, mandates, executive orders, or any other federal dictate having the full force and effect of law.
• The joint federal review committee consists of five members of the House of Representatives to be appointed by the speaker of the House of Representatives and five members of the Senate to be appointed by the president pro tempore of the Senate. The members of the joint federal review committee shall be appointed biennially for terms expiring on January first of each succeeding odd-numbered year and shall serve until their respective successors are appointed and qualified. No more than three from each legislative body may be from the same political party.
• The joint federal review committee shall be co-chaired by one member of the House of Representatives, chosen by the speaker of the house, and one member of the Senate, chosen by the president pro tempore of the Senate, and shall be provided with staff assistance from the Legislative Research Council. This will ensure that “We the People” of the State of Iowa will use First Amendment Petitions for the redress of grievances to guarantee that the County and State public servants will be held to the rule of law. Those who refuse to support the Constitution which they are legally bound to support, must be removed from office or public trust for their failure to fulfill their oath of office, in accordance with Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. A working copy of the Bill that needs to be passed, as well as the roles and responsibilities of this Committee that will demand full compliance to the Constitution as well as a flowchart depicting the byproducts of this committee can be found on the Reclaiming the Republic.
Fifth:
Concurrently, while the Iowa State Legislature is forming a standing committee and initiating the audit of the Constitution for the United States and in addition to definitizing the Constitution and its terms and definitions as stipulated in the Ratification Debates, the State Legislature of Iowa must promulgate this Petition with an endorsement cover letter to all other States in the union; calling upon all States to unite with Iowa, in taking all necessary measures to obtain full compliance to the Supreme Law of the land the Constitution for the United States as it was legally stipulated and defined in the Ratification Debates in accordance with the Constitution and the fundamental tenants of contract law.
Sixth:
All public servants while under their legal oath of office or falsely serving in office are to be removed from office in accordance to Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment are no longer eligible to be in office for violating their obligation to support the Constitution for the United States. Public servants are neither afforded an impeachment process nor due process, since this is the enforcement of Constitutional eligibility as defined in Congress while the Fourteenth Amendment was being debated for passage.
Seventh:
We the People demand that our county Commissioners and State legislatures create a Iowa State Legislature create and pass law to observe and comply with the enforcement of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, empowering the people to be able to initiate the enforcement of this law that when “We the People” report public servant(s) who have violated their oath by failing to support the Constitution, they are immediately suspended and that a Common Law Grand Jury of the people of the State be formed with at least one juror from each county to determine whether the oath of office was violated or not. If violated the public servant is removed and banned from public service and the public servants name and finger prints be promulgated to all States in the union to ensure that they can no longer hold an office of public trust or of profit – unless two thirds of both houses of Congress vote to remove this disability in accordance with Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Eighth:
We demand the full and transparent documentation in accounting the actions of all public servants regarding what they do and do not do in response to each step of this petition both in hard and soft copy provided back to [organizational name and address as well as POC name and phone number].